Standing on the line

It is with a very heavy heart that I feel prompted to communicate to all of the individuals receiving this communication. I have invested a tremendous amount of time, energy and yes passion, to advocate on the behalf of private citizens whose children are experiencing incredible harm within our public education system.

I have been transparent, authentic and beyond reasonable in my attempts to be a free citizen,  just desiring to remain secure in my constitutional rights, to publicly address a local school board. These attempts have been met with a contemptuous, defiant and hostile response. Even such unprofessional conduct as mockery and false statements regarding policy and law. This attitude has permeated all communications with those in public service who have sworn an oath to uphold, defend and protect my rights.

On March 14th Trooper Kochka (Pennsylvania State Trooper), (allegedly under the direction of Octorara School Superintendent, Dr. Orner, or Octorara School Board President, Brian Fox) had stated (on the record) that I had not committed a crime. I was threatened with arrest if I failed to leave a limited public forum at an Octorara School board meeting. If I failed to leave that I would be arrested and charged with defiant criminal trespass after warning.

I attempted to correct Trooper Kochka, that criminalizing a constitutional right is not protected through qualified immunity and he would be at risk of personal litigation under 18 USC 241, 18 USC 242 and 42 USC 1983. I had suggested that he clarify his authority with a supervisor and the District Attorney to confirm the limits of his authority on public property. I was met with linguistic verbal judo (customary training of law enforcement) which my responses were met with contempt and ignored. (This is documented and preserved as an objective video record in the public domain).

I have repeatedly attempted to obtain records of an official criminal trespass document, sworn affidavit, probable cause affidavit. As of the writing of this document, the response has been two fold. 

One, is that no record exists through the Pennsylvania State Police, right to know law official. Secondly, Trooper Kochka is relying upon a written email communication to me, referencing a letter, sent to me via certified mail, from Dr. Orner. Dr. Orner’s letter state’s that I was being denied access to the school for causing a “disturbance”.  No sworn affidavit is documented from the reporting party which defines the criminal actions under the allegation of a “disturbance”.

Attempting to exercise a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime (Murdock v Pennsylvania), and constitutes a deprivation of rights under Color of Law.

Further, right to know law requests have confirmed that many public servants are alleging that my activities and denying access to public records under the claim that they are denied based upon “pending criminal investigation.”

It is my desire to return to Octorara School Board to speak at the appropriate time, place manner with my 1st and 4th amendment rights restored. However, it is not reasonable that any law enforcement will protect my rights and further attempt to criminalize my attempt to be free and advocate for my clients.

If I return, it is inevitable that the School Board will generate another call for service to the State Police. State Police will respond to the call for service, and act unlawfully at the direction of the reporting party.

I have previously submitted to all School Board Members a notice “Color of Law Violation”, which identifies deprivation of rights under color of law dated 1/21/2022. The school board ignored that warning and continues to this day to enforce a policy requiring citizens to surrender their 4th amendment right to exercise their 1st amendment.

I also provided a letter to all school board members, in their private person capacity, which was a notice of an intent to sue, along with a settlement to restore my rights to redress the school board. This letter was ignored by all school board members and I received a letter from the school solicitor falsely claiming that I am suing the “school board”. The solicitor is guilty of using tax payer funds to respond to private legal matters of private individuals. I chose to ignore the document from the solicitor as it was filled with so many false statements in addition the solicitor claimed they would not provide any response regardless of my actions.

If I choose to return to Octorara School to attend a board meeting, it is prudent to be prepared for continued lawless by a number of indivudal’s who project authority.

As I allege, no lawful document exists of a criminal trespass, probable cause affidavit or sworn affidavit, I will request evidence that one exists.

Assuming that it would be reasonable to request verification of the claim that such a document exists, requesting the ability to review such a document in advance of enforcing a crime of defiant trespass after warning.

If I were to return, on my person will be my evidence that Pennsylvania State Police state no criminal trespass warning was documented along with other evidence.

It should be reasonable that an officer honor their oath, and it is not reasonable that a citizen can enter into a discussion of warning of civil rights violations, clarification of the law, request a supervisor, ask to verify the law with the District Attorney.

However, what is not desired, yet predicted, is that an officer would attempt to deploy verbal judo, talk over a citizen, ignore the citizen, redirect the conversation and use their authority to affect their will and domination under the color of law.

If an officer responds contemptuously to any attempt of protecting a citizens rights, I will remain silent and not resist the unlawful violent actions an officer may take.

It is not desirable, nor the objective to agitate, provoke, instigate, but merely attempt to be a free citizen. Preparedness is our only safety when encountering authority who has qualified immunity protections to act in the moment and have legal protection from the victims if they attempt to seek justice.

It must be anticipated that impulsive, reactionary decisions will take place, and that I will rapidly be charged with defiant criminal trespass, and that no document of criminal trespass warning will be forth coming. However, it is not reasonable to expect that law enforcement will attempt to fabricate or create some document and back date it, in contradiction to existing evidence. One would hope that this would not happen, but when we the people have no visibility to what happens in secret we run the risk of conspiratorial acts by those in authority.

An impulsive, authoritarian act will include establishing dominance over me, through the use of pain compliance and torture devices. Kidnapping me from public property and moving me from public property into a dungeon.

I would then be held in captivity, against my will, for a crime I did not commit, for a duration until I would be arraigned before a magistrate with the charge of Defiant Trespass after warning and be assigned a bond.

If I am unlawfully arrested (no presentation of a lawful criminal trespass warning), I will not pay the bond as the crimes are being perpetrated by others, with no regard to the rights of a citizen, with the intentionality of premeditated malice to cause harm.  I am making this statement clearly in advance as this document is being presented well in advance of the possibility of me attempting to be free. The prevailing attitude I have come to experience, within public service is that you might be the charge, but will not beat the ride.

I will remain in the dungeon, unable to gain access to the scheduled medical procedures for my heath. I am under no obligation to disclose my private, personal medical history to a non HIPPA covered entity.

Upon completion of arraignment, I will NOT post bond, I will remain in the dungeon until I am afforded a preliminary hearing. At such time, I will be requesting the arresting officer to produce all documents, probable cause affidavit, sworn affidavit, that validates a lawful criminal trespass from public property. As all of my evidence supports that the PSP have confirmed no record exists. I will share access to my evidence to the Magistrate, but have little faith that the Magistrate will review my evidence.

It has never been my desire to be in this situation. However, I have provided sufficient documentation, advanced notice of my intentions, along with my preparedness in how I will conduct myself. I have significantly documented a systemic problem of unlawful actions under Color of Law.

I have attempted to be reasonable, and never desired to make this a federal case. In the event that my predictions are true, my evidence is valid, the public records responses are truthful, the impact to all involved individuals will be based upon acting in their private person capacity in violation of their oath and loss of qualified immunity.

I am not seeking justice at all. I merely want to be a law abiding citizen capable of exercising their concerns on behalf of affected children at a public meeting. If I am met with unlawful actors, justice will be determined in a court of law, with a jury of ones peers.

It is completely not lost on me that this is not usual and customary of a citizen willing to go to these lengths. But our justice system tells citizens, ignorance of the law is not a defense, and we have a duty and obligation to know the law, and correct those who misrepresent the law. However, we have no power or authority to ensure public servants comply with the law nor honor their oath. Accepting this as a limitation, I chose to be informed, prepared, respectful, professional and strived to be reasonable. This is my hope that this communication is received in the spirit it is being delivered and those representing authority, honor their oath. But, the reality is, a citizen must be prepared for that not to happen and resolve their issues, not on the public square, but in the courtroom.

Oh hi there 👋 It’s nice to meet you.

Sign up to receive our FREE newsletter, in your inbox, every month.

We don’t spam! Read our [link]privacy policy[/link] for more info.